this article was at the beginning published at the
communique. The booklet contributed this newsletter to live technological
know-how's expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
due to the fact conservation scientists try to shed mild on
an artist’s strategies and substances selections, our work can be like that of
a detective.
using superior scientific techniques, we have to investigate
the bodily and chemical homes of works of artwork. but we have to additionally
sift thru historic and archival files for particular mentions of substances or
technologies, and how they’ve been traditionally used.
i used to be part of a group of scientists from The
Northwestern college/artwork Institute of Chicago middle for medical research
in the Arts (NU-access) that collaborated with Guggenheim Museum conservators
Carol Stringari and Julie Barten.
We wanted to analyze the materials and techniques employed
by means of the distinguished Bauhaus artist László Moholy-Nagy (1895-1945). in
the course of his profession, the Hungarian artist explored a massive kind of
media – consisting of many newly-advanced business plastics – to test with
transparency and mirrored image.
for that reason, i discovered myself immersed in, amongst
all matters, the history of plastics – and their messy nomenclature.
alongside the way, we found a key mistakes inside the
description of certainly one of Moholy-Nagy’s primary materials – a mistake
that, had it gone overlooked, ought to have resulted within the deterioration
of the portray Tp 2.
The plasticity of names
historically, it’s commonplace for chemical products to be
renamed.
we all agree that Aspirin sounds lighter and some distance
extra pronounceable than its ponderous chemical name, acetylsalicylic acid.
identical with the clipped sounding wonderful Glue and Teflon – that are
technically known as cyanoacrylates and polytetrafluoroethylene, respectively.
beginning at the quit of the nineteenth century, the growing
chemical enterprise made a number of of recent plastics with unexceptional
chemical names. these were then rebranded for public consumption. Phenol
formaldehyde resin became Bakelite, whilst cellulose nitrate was known as
celluloid. objects shaped from polymethyl methacrylate got here to be referred
to as plexiglas.
unfortunately, the rebranded versions regularly have 0
reference to their authentic substances. exclusive plastics may be lumped together
beneath an umbrella term. this may show problematic for know-how the records of
our substances, together with the ones utilized in paintings.
now not exceptionally, I ran throughout my personal issues
with “brand-ification” when I started out investigating Moholy-Nagy’s artwork –
specifically, Tp 2 (1930), wherein the artist painted bold geometric shapes on
an opaque sheet of thick, blue plastic.
Mamma Mia!
The portray regarded to be in top notch situation. It made
experience, then, that museum data described the plastic as a
phenol-formaldehyde resin called Trolitan – the German equivalent of Bakelite,
a synthetic plastic acknowledged for its long-time period stability.
but, this trendy impact modified right away while NU-get
entry to’s co-director Francesca Casadio finished an on-web page evaluation of
Tp 2.
“Mamma mia!” she exclaimed; the substrate was actually
cellulose nitrate, a very specific sort of early plastic – and one prone to
intense degradation.
Now we had to learn extra approximately the true origin and
system of the blue plastic heritage.
Guggenheim conservator Julie Barten supplied me with a
micro-pattern – invisible to the naked eye – from the lower back of Tp 2 to
allow me to take a look at the plastic in greater detail and learn extra
approximately its circumstance. After getting ready the pattern as a
go-segment, I analyzed it using scanning electron miscroscopy, which found out
that the plastic changed into full of a remarkably excessive quantity of
gypsum.
the use of this data as a manual, I researched cellulose
nitrate German manufacturers of the Thirties and determined that the plastic
utilized in Tp 2 was, in reality, a material called Trolit F, a particularly
crammed cellulose nitrate plastic produced at the Rheinisch-Westfälischen
Sprengstoff-Fabriken (RWS) company in Germany.
Delving into the enterprise data, i found that the RWS
business enterprise initially produced explosives for the German military
during world battle I, but turned to plastic production in the postwar years.
RWS could increase a large variety of plastic products, all with the prefix
“Tro”: Trolit F, Trolit W, Trolon, Trolitan, Trolitul, and many others.
The prefix, I discovered, became derived from Troisdorf, the
town where RWS changed into integrated close to Cologne. RWS used it similar to
how Apple employs the letter “i” in its iPod, iPhone and iPad products.
whilst the Tro-line of products certainly had a nice
business ring, it absolutely obscured the chemical identification of the
plastic. Trolit F and Trolit W, for example, are wonderful sorts of plastic. each has unique
properties and makes use of.
Even more complicated, advertisements from the generation
display that they have been both sold by using the business enterprise under
the single name of Trolit. So it’s completely viable that clients didn’t
understand which sort of plastic they had purchased.
in the meantime, the media similarly obscured the real
identification of these plastics. A 1936 unique problem of the avant-garde
magazine Telehor were committed to Moholy-Nagy’s art. but, in the mag – which
was issued in 4 languages – editors spelled Trolit otherwise in every of the
four variants: “Trolit” (German), “Trolite” (English), “Trolithe” (French) and
“Trolitem” (Czech).
lost in translation
when getting to know this piece, I have become satisfied
that Moholy-Nagy knew he became the use of Trolit material for Tp 2, due to the
fact that he cited it by name in his writings. He extensively utilized Trolit
wall panels with the equal elongated proportions in his room design for the
Paris Werkbund exhibition in 1930.
but, on the same time, a close exam of Moholy-Nagy’s
correspondence indicates that the artist incorrectly concept that the names
“Trolit” and “Bakelite” have been interchangeable – and this will be at the
basis of next misclassification of the material composition of Tp 2.
From the exceptional sources of facts to be had, the
specific starting place of the confusion surrounding Tp 2 might be traced again
to 1937, when the painting entered the Solomon R Guggenheim series.
As stated earlier, the fabric used for Tp 2 changed into at
first (almost) accurately defined as “Trolite” within the 1936 difficulty of
Telehor magazine. however upon becoming a member of the museum series, the
fabric was alternatively defined as Bakelite.
Museum facts of Tp 2 show that Bakelite turned into later
re-translated as the fabric Trolitan – RWS’s version of Bakelite.
this would had been constant with the portray identify, due
to the fact that Moholy’s titles often reference guide materials. for instance,
his art work Al three and Cop I have been executed on aluminum (Al) and copper
plate (Cop).
Our materials studies has introduced new portions to this
puzzle. We’ve linked the Tp 2 plastic base to the especially-filled cellulose
nitrate Trolit F from RWS. It’s additionally practicable that “Tp” refers to
“Trolit poliert” or “Trolit Platte” – “polished Trolit” or “Trolit panel” in
German.
because cellulose nitrate plastics can become worse pretty
appreciably, they require specific care and garage situations to maintain them.
And Tp 2 – lengthy concept to be supported by the strong Bakelite – will now
want to be cared for as it should be, especially with the aid of designing most
useful situations for storage.
As this tale indicates, it’s crucial to correlate archival
and historic facts with medical evaluation. by using figuring out – and
correcting – misleading language, conservators can higher care for iconic works
of artwork.
